Myths about Sexuality in Parents of Adolescents with Disabilities: Implications for Inclusive Sex Education

Abstract

This study analyzes myths about sexuality among parents of adolescents with disabilities and their implications for building an inclusive sex education that respects human rights. Method: A qualitative study with a phenomenological design and exploratory scope was conducted at a Multiple Attention Center in Morelos, Mexico. Ten mothers of adolescents with intellectual disabilities, autism, or Down syndrome participated. Semi-structured interviews were applied, based on eight myths about sexuality in people with disabilities, plus two emerging categories. Data analysis was carried out through thematic coding and comparison with previous literature. Results: Multiple myths were identified, with infantilization, asexuality, and non-reproduction being the most frequent. Notably, the justification of non-consensual sterilization practices and the perception of people with disabilities as “life companions” without the right to autonomy were highlighted. Alarming narratives also emerged regarding the purchase of wives for sons with disabilities. In some cases, guidance from teachers and physicians contributed to either mitigating or reinforcing these myths. Conclusions: The findings show that myths about sexuality persist within families and may undermine the reproductive rights of adolescents with disabilities, particularly women. It is recommended to promote inclusive sex education programs directed at families and professionals from a human rights perspective, fostering self-determination and a full life for people with disabilities.